IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v58y2020i21p6724-6738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lot synchronization in make-to-order shops with order release control: an assessment by simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Nuno O. Fernandes
  • Matthias Thürer
  • Mark Stevenson
  • Sílvio Carmo-Silva

Abstract

Lot splitting is an important strategy for avoiding the starvation of workstations, for accelerating the progress of jobs, and ultimately for improving overall due date performance. While lot splitting has received much attention in the extant literature, the use of alternative lot transfer policies that determine how the flow of lots through the production system is synchronised has been largely neglected. This study uses simulation to assess the performance of different lot synchronisation policies at release and different lot transfer policies on the shop floor in a ConWIP (Constant Work-In-Process) controlled job shop. The results suggest that different approaches should be applied at the release and shop floor levels. While lots should be synchronised in some form at order release, their progress on the shop floor should not be synchronised. Instead, lot coordination should be executed by dispatching in accordance with repetitive lots logic. The results further highlight that if lot progress is synchronised in systems that limit the workload, then lot release should also be synchronised. Otherwise, blocking may occur if lot progress on the shop floor depends on the release of lots, which in turn depends on lot progress. These findings have important implications for research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuno O. Fernandes & Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson & Sílvio Carmo-Silva, 2020. "Lot synchronization in make-to-order shops with order release control: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(21), pages 6724-6738, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:58:y:2020:i:21:p:6724-6738
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1685701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2019.1685701
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2019.1685701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:58:y:2020:i:21:p:6724-6738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.