The impact of human consideration, schedule types and product mix on scheduling objectives for unpaced mixed-model assembly lines

There is an increasing awareness in scheduling research that human behaviour needs to be considered explicitly in scheduling models. Although most scheduling literature ignores human behaviour, especially sequence-dependent processing times form a good basis for explicit consideration. Hence, a processing time function is derived that considers the effects of learning, forgetting, fatigue and recovery. The necessity for explicit human consideration can be regarded as most urgent for unpaced highly-manual mixed-model assembly lines. Based on real data a simulation study is conducted to determine the effect of explicit human consideration while also taking into account the effects of different idealised schedule types and the product mix. The results strongly indicate that the product mix has a consistently high impact on scheduling objectives, the schedule type affects lower-level objectives like starving and blocking times to a greater extent than higher-level objectives like makespan and flow time, and that for certain objectives the height of the objective values and the relative favourability of schedule types depends on human consideration.