IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v58y2020i11p3235-3251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade-off balancing between maximum and total completion times for no-wait flow shop production

Author

Listed:
  • Honghan Ye
  • Wei Li
  • Barrie R. Nault

Abstract

We propose a trade-off balancing (TOB) heuristic in a no-wait flow shop to minimise the weighted sum of maximum completion time ( $C_{\max } $Cmax) and total completion time (TCT) based on machine idle times. We introduce a factorisation scheme to construct the initial sequence based on current and future idle times at the operational level. In addition, we propose a novel estimation method to establish the mathematical relationship between the objectives min( $C_{\max } $Cmax) and min(TCT) at the production line level. To evaluate the performance of the TOB heuristic, computational experiments are conducted on the classic Taillard's benchmark and one-year historical data from University of Kentucky HealthCare (UKHC). The computational results show that minimisations of $C_{\max } $Cmax and TCT yield inconsistent scheduling sequences, and these two sequences are relatively uncorrelated. We also show that our TOB heuristic performs better than the best existing heuristics with the same computational complexity and generates stable performances in balancing trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Honghan Ye & Wei Li & Barrie R. Nault, 2020. "Trade-off balancing between maximum and total completion times for no-wait flow shop production," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 3235-3251, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:58:y:2020:i:11:p:3235-3251
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1630777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2019.1630777
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2019.1630777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:58:y:2020:i:11:p:3235-3251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.