IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v56y2018i3p1299-1312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance comparison of multiple product kanban control systems

Author

Listed:
  • Rajesh Piplani
  • Alvin Wei Hern Ang

Abstract

Kanban control systems have been around for decades and have been used to control work-in-process of manufacturing systems. Lately many variations of the basic control system have been developed; however, much of the work in the development and comparison of control systems has focused on a single-stage manufacturing system producing a single product type. In this research, we present procedures for optimising multiple product kanban control systems, namely Base Stock, Traditional Kanban Control System and Extended Kanban Control System (both dedicated and shared type). We then conduct a detailed simulation study to compare the performance of the systems using a common total cost measure. Numerical results show that the dedicated and shared-extended kanban control systems outperform the other two systems. The study also shows that in spite of their different schematics and contrary to conventional wisdom, the performance of dedicated and shared-extended kanban control systems doesn’t differ much.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajesh Piplani & Alvin Wei Hern Ang, 2018. "Performance comparison of multiple product kanban control systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 1299-1312, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:3:p:1299-1312
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1332436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2017.1332436
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2017.1332436?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guodong Huang & Jie Chen & Yacob Khojasteh, 2021. "A cyber-physical system deployment based on pull strategies for one-of-a-kind production with limited resources," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 579-596, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:3:p:1299-1312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.