IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v56y2018i12p4100-4114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical study of service postponement: locating the push–pull boundary

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen Iacocca
  • Matthew Liberatore

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine if service firms can profitably perform postponement. We develop a general model to identify the optimal location of the push–pull boundary, or extent of postponement. While previous literature discusses the benefit of applying postponement to the service industry this is the first paper to-date that mathematically models the benefit of service postponement. This paper illustrates how service companies can balance the trade-off between increased responsiveness and increased costs. The single-stage newsvendor model is iteratively applied to each stage of the service process to determine the optimal level of postponement. Two examples demonstrate the value of postponement and the impact of changes in service characteristics are investigated. Finally, this paper provides guidance for service industry professionals on policy-level decisions and applications of postponement.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen Iacocca & Matthew Liberatore, 2018. "An empirical study of service postponement: locating the push–pull boundary," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 4100-4114, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:12:p:4100-4114
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1436786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2018.1436786
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2018.1436786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:12:p:4100-4114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.