IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i24p7452-7472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preventing ergonomic risks with integrated planning on assembly line balancing and parts feeding

Author

Listed:
  • Daria Battini
  • Martina Calzavara
  • Alena Otto
  • Fabio Sgarbossa

Abstract

In this paper, we advise to perform assembly line balancing simultaneously with decision-making on parts feeding. Such integrated planning may open additional potential to reduce labour costs. Additional planning flexibility gained with the integrated planning may be used to mitigate ergonomic risks at workplaces. We formulate the integrated assembly line balancing and parts feeding planning problem, propose a mixed-integer model and compare integrated planning to a common hierarchical planning approach in a detailed case study on the assembly of a self-priming pump. Our case study illustrates that workplaces with high ergonomic risks may emerge even in productions that involve handling parts and workpieces of low weights and avoid static and awkward postures. We also show that the proposed integrated planning approach may eliminate excessive ergonomic risks and improve productivity indicators simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Daria Battini & Martina Calzavara & Alena Otto & Fabio Sgarbossa, 2017. "Preventing ergonomic risks with integrated planning on assembly line balancing and parts feeding," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(24), pages 7452-7472, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:24:p:7452-7472
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1363427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2017.1363427
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2017.1363427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2022. "Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Li, Mingxing & Huang, George Q., 2021. "Production-intralogistics synchronization of industry 4.0 flexible assembly lines under graduation intelligent manufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Schmid, Nico André & Limère, Veronique & Raa, Birger, 2021. "Mixed model assembly line feeding with discrete location assignments and variable station space," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Emilio Moretti & Elena Tappia & Martina Mauri & Marco Melacini, 2022. "A performance model for mobile robot-based part feeding systems to supermarkets," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 580-613, September.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2022. "Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 797-814.
    6. Adenipekun, Ebenezer Olatunde & Limère, Veronique & Schmid, Nico André, 2022. "The impact of transportation optimisation on assembly line feeding," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    8. Stefan Fedtke & Nils Boysen & Patrick Schumacher, 2023. "In-line kitting for part feeding of assembly lines: workload balancing and storage assignment to reduce the workers’ walking effort," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(3), pages 717-758, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:24:p:7452-7472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.