IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i23p7204-7222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Readiness, feasibility and confidence: how to help bidders to better develop and assess their offers

Author

Listed:
  • Abdourahim Sylla
  • Elise Vareilles
  • Thierry Coudert
  • Konstantinos Kirytopoulos
  • Michel Aldanondo
  • Laurent Geneste

Abstract

In a bidding process, the bidder must define and evaluate potential offers in order to propose the most suitable one to the potential customer. Proposing attractive but also realistic offers to various potential customers is a key factor for the bidder to stay competitive. In order to achieve this, the bidder needs to be very sure about the technical specifications and the constructability of the proposal. However, performing a detailed design is resource and time-consuming. This article proposes the foundation of a new framework which can help bidders to define the right offer: (i) in the context of a non-routine design process, while avoiding a detailed design and (ii) taking into account two new indicators that reflect the bidder’s confidence that they can meet the commitments once the offer is accepted. The first indicator (OCS) characterises the Overall Confidence in the technical System, while the second one (OCP) gives the Overall Confidence in the delivery Process. Both OCS and OCP are based firstly on two factual objective indicators, Technology Readiness Level (TRL) for OCS and Activity Feasibility Level (AFL) for OCP, and secondly on two human-based subjective indicators, Confidence In System (CIS) for the OCS and Confidence In Process for the OCP. An illustrative application shows how this framework can really help bidders define an offer, while avoiding detailed design and enable them to evaluate the confidence level in each potential offer.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdourahim Sylla & Elise Vareilles & Thierry Coudert & Konstantinos Kirytopoulos & Michel Aldanondo & Laurent Geneste, 2017. "Readiness, feasibility and confidence: how to help bidders to better develop and assess their offers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 7204-7222, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:23:p:7204-7222
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1353156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2017.1353156
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2017.1353156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:23:p:7204-7222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.