IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i23p7168-7186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology alignment and business strategy: a performance measurement and Dynamic Capability perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Rodney McAdam
  • Umit Bititci
  • Brendan Galbraith

Abstract

Rapid changes in market structures and technology lead to misalignment between strategy and operations. Whist this phenomenon is most prevalent in technology-based manufacturing industries, utility organisations (e.g. electricity and telecoms) provide a useful context to explore the Performance measurement (PM) and technology alignment challenges from a Dynamic Capabilities Theory perspective where there is a progressive shift towards deregulated markets. The aim of this paper is twofold: first, to explore the role of Dynamic Capabilities Theory and PM approaches in improving the alignment between business strategy and technology strategy (Level 1 alignment); second, to explore the role of Dynamic Capabilities Theory and PM approaches in aligning technology strategy with operational technology routines and practices (Level 2 alignment). In the absence of overarching theory, an inductive approach draws upon Dynamic Capabilities theory. Four longitudinal case studies are used leading to the development of a conceptual framework and propositions for multilevel technology alignment. Data from 38 interviews and 8 separate focus groups, documentation and participant observations (over a three-year period) are used. The theory-building process shows the need to identify and develop PM-based technology alignment Dynamic Capabilities (PM-DCs) which help in improving and maintaining alignment between business strategy and technology strategy (Level 1 alignment) and between technology strategy and technology practices (Level 2 alignment). This approach requires critically reflective action-learning approaches to identify and nurture these PM-DCs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodney McAdam & Umit Bititci & Brendan Galbraith, 2017. "Technology alignment and business strategy: a performance measurement and Dynamic Capability perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 7168-7186, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:23:p:7168-7186
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1351633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351633
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Moffett, Sandra, 2021. "Mission or margin? Using dynamic capabilities to manage tensions in social purpose organisations’ business model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 643-657.
    2. Jurij JakliÄ & Vesna Bosilj-VukÅ¡ić & Jan Mendling & Mojca Indihar Å temberger, 2021. "The Orchestration of Corporate Performance Management and Business Process Management and Its Effect on Perceived Organizational Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    3. Zaenal Aripin & Uce Karna Suganda & Allizia Zulfa Kusumah, 2022. "Marketing intelligence: Innovation ability to anticipate global competition," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(1), pages 328-339, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:23:p:7168-7186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.