IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i18p5305-5329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for managing performance and risk in integrated procurement–production planning

Author

Listed:
  • Rihab Khemiri
  • Khaoula Elbedoui-Maktouf
  • Bernard Grabot
  • Belhassen Zouari

Abstract

Nowadays in Supply Chain (SC) networks, a high level of risk comes from SC partners. An effective risk management process becomes as a consequence mandatory, especially at the tactical planning level. The aim of this article is to present a risk-oriented integrated procurement–production approach for tactical planning in a multi-echelon SC network involving multiple suppliers, multiple parallel manufacturing plants, multiple subcontractors and several customers. An originality of the work is to combine an analytical model allowing to build feasible scenarios and a multi-criteria approach for assessing these scenarios. The literature has mainly addressed the problem through cost or profit-based optimisation and seldom considers more qualitative yet important criteria linked to risk, like trust in the supplier, flexibility or resilience. Unlike the traditional approaches, we present a method evaluating each possible supply scenario through performance-based and risk-based decision criteria, involving both qualitative and quantitative factors, in order to clearly separate the performance of a scenario and the risk taken if it is adopted. Since the decision-maker often cannot provide crisp values for some critical data, fuzzy sets theory is suggested in order to model vague information based on subjective expertise. Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution is used to determine both the performance and risk measures correlated to each possible tactical plan. The applicability and tractability of the proposed approach is shown on an illustrative example and a sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the influence of criteria weights on the selection of the procurement–production plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Rihab Khemiri & Khaoula Elbedoui-Maktouf & Bernard Grabot & Belhassen Zouari, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for managing performance and risk in integrated procurement–production planning," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 5305-5329, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:18:p:5305-5329
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1308575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308575
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L. Herlina & Machfud & E. Anggraeni & Sukardi, 2019. "Pareto-based algorithm for adaptive aggregate production and distribution planning in shrimp agroindustry supply chain," Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, Prof. Vakhrushev Alexander, vol. 5(1), pages 21-29.
    2. Rukundo Jean D'amour & Mukamuhirwa Floride & Nsigaye Alfred, 2020. "Effect of organic, inorganic fertilizers and their combination on vegetative growth and production of common bush beans RWR2245 variety in Rwanda," Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, Prof. Vakhrushev Alexander, vol. 6(1), pages 18-24.
    3. Pereira, Daniel Filipe & Oliveira, José Fernando & Carravilla, Maria Antónia, 2020. "Tactical sales and operations planning: A holistic framework and a literature review of decision-making models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Maureen S. Golan & Laura H. Jernegan & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 222-243, June.
    5. Meng, Lin & Lv, Wangyong & Yuan, George Xianzhi & Wang, Huiqi, 2023. "The dynamic risk profiles and management strategies in supply chain coopetition under altruistic preference," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:18:p:5305-5329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.