IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v45y2007i1p103-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enriched multi-process modelling in support of the life cycle engineering of Business Processes

Author

Listed:
  • K. A. Chatha
  • J. O. Ajaefobi
  • R. H. Weston

Abstract

A new approach to enterprise modelling is described that facilitates the reuse of multi-perspective models of Business Process networks. The approach has been designed to advance current best practice when engineering change to interdependent Business Processes of types commonly deployed within Manufacturing Enterprises. The approach is unique in the way it maintains coherence between (1) conventional enterprise models, used primarily to represent graphically (at multiple levels of abstraction) relatively enduring properties of Business Process networks; and (2) dynamic models of selected segments of a parent Business Process network, which can be computer-executed via conventional simulation modelling and workflow modelling technology. Thereby, context-dependent dynamic models can be used to replicate and analyse historical patterns of enterprise behaviour, and predict and analyse possible future patterns of enterprise behaviour, should selected elements and parameters of the modelled Business Process network be changed. The paper also considers ‘needed decision support capabilities’ during Business Process Reengineering and Business Process improvement projects. In so doing, it collates those decision support requirements identified into a generalized description of the life phases of such projects. This generalized description was used to help structure the design of the new enterprise modelling approach. Furthermore, it is used to help illustrate an example application of the new modelling approach.

Suggested Citation

  • K. A. Chatha & J. O. Ajaefobi & R. H. Weston, 2007. "Enriched multi-process modelling in support of the life cycle engineering of Business Processes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 103-141, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:45:y:2007:i:1:p:103-141
    DOI: 10.1080/00207540600607150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207540600607150
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207540600607150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Céline Averseng, 2011. "How to structure the complexity without giving up the thematic exhaustiveness of a state of the art in management science? Feedback on the methodological contribution of classification tools of qualit," Post-Print hal-01992760, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:45:y:2007:i:1:p:103-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.