IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v38y2000i1p141-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of push and pull lot splitting approaches on lot traceability and material handling costs in stochastic flow shop environments

Author

Listed:
  • Hemant V. Kher
  • Manoj K. Malhotra
  • Daniel C. Steele

Abstract

This study evaluates how the procedures followed in splitting job lots on the shop floor influence both material handling and lot integrity in stochastic flow shop environments. Former work has shown that lot splitting improves flow time and customer service performance, but with an increased number of transfers along with a corresponding increase in material handling costs. Physical lot integrity, which is important to lot tracing, has not been considered in prior literature. In order to overcome these limitations and address material handling concerns better, we define a new measure of performance called the lot integrity loss exposure (LILE). We use this and other measures to show that the traditional 'push' approach that has been followed in modelling lot splitting complicates lot traceability in the shop and leads to an excessive number of transfers. As an alternative, we propose a 'pull' approach in which an order is split between any successive pair of machines only on an as-needed basis. The push and pull approaches for lot splitting are compared under a range of conditions characterized by factors such as machine utilization levels within the shop, setup-to-processing time ratios, and number of splits created in job lots. Our results indicate that relative to the push approach, pull lot splitting helps significantly in reducing the number of transfers incurred and in maintaining a greater degree of physical lot integrity. At the same time, there is no significant difference in the two approaches with respect to improvements in flow time and customer service measures. Both the degree to which lot integrity is preserved, and the extent of savings in material handling that result from using the pull approach, are shown to be most pronounced under conditions characterized by high machine utilizations rates and setup-to-processing time ratios. Managerial implications of our study along with further research directions in this area are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemant V. Kher & Manoj K. Malhotra & Daniel C. Steele, 2000. "The effect of push and pull lot splitting approaches on lot traceability and material handling costs in stochastic flow shop environments," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 141-160, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:38:y:2000:i:1:p:141-160
    DOI: 10.1080/002075400189626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/002075400189626
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/002075400189626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:38:y:2000:i:1:p:141-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.