Author
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an analysis on document interdependencies in a major production system delivery process. In total 28 chief engineers from various design groups were interviewed by identifying the main document classes produced and the required input information. The results of the interviews were summarised into a Design Structure Matrix (DSM) representation. Analyses were made based on design groups, document classes and on the exchange of documents. The group-level analysis highlights the central role of inter-organisational information transfer between the manufacturer and customer as well as between manufacturer and consultant behind the system configuration. The analysis on document classes indicates that the total number of different documents required as an input from the project partners remains small, when compared to the overall document mass. More specifically, the analysis highlights the fundamental role of the requirements specification produced in the course of bid preparation. Concerning the physical document exchange, the study shows that for in-house transfers the electronic medium is widely used. However, paper-print is still the predominant media for transferring information across organisational boundaries. At the same time around 90% of the end-system cost comes from machinery, external design work and parts and components supplied by external vendors. The results indicate, that by focusing on the key documents (10% of the overall document mass), which are needed by practically all collaborating parties and design groups (90% of the contributors), and their efficient dissemination and control, the project could be carried out with fewer mistakes and uncertainty. It is also concluded that Internet and WWW based solutions are rapidly becoming mature enough to tackle the challenge of inter-organisational document sharing.
Suggested Citation
A.-P. Hameri, 1999.
"Document viewpoint on one-of-a-kind delivery process,"
International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 1319-1336, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:37:y:1999:i:6:p:1319-1336
DOI: 10.1080/002075499191274
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:37:y:1999:i:6:p:1319-1336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.