IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v19y2025i1p39-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using discrete-event simulation to assess an AHP-based dynamic patient prioritisation policy for elective surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Youness Frichi
  • Lina Aboueljinane
  • Fouad Jawab

Abstract

Patient prioritisation in elective surgery is a critical multi-criteria decision-making issue. Elective patients should be ranked on the waiting list based on various criteria related to their health conditions and their evolution over time. This study suggests a dynamic prioritisation where elective patients are ranked considering their evolving health conditions, waiting time, and patient loss, i.e., the likelihood of patients abandoning the waiting list. We proposed deploying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to weigh prioritisation criteria. The AHP-derived weights are integrated into a discrete-event simulation model, which periodically ranks patients considering their health status, waiting time, and patient loss. The proposed dynamic prioritisation is compared with the first-come, first-served (FCFS) policy and the static prioritisation, which ranks patients according to their initial priority. Results showed that dynamic prioritisation outperforms the FCFS and static prioritisation policies in preventing health deterioration, reducing weighted waiting time, and reducing the ratio of lost patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Youness Frichi & Lina Aboueljinane & Fouad Jawab, 2025. "Using discrete-event simulation to assess an AHP-based dynamic patient prioritisation policy for elective surgery," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 39-63, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:39-63
    DOI: 10.1080/17477778.2023.2284145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17477778.2023.2284145
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17477778.2023.2284145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:39-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.