IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v18y2024i5p851-867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the supply chain resilience strategies using discrete event simulation and hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (case study: natural stone industry)

Author

Listed:
  • Maede Mirzaaliyan
  • Mojtaba Hajian Heidary
  • Maghsoud Amiri

Abstract

One of the challenges that organisations face is the risk reduction through creating resilient supply chains. There are different strategies to reach the resiliency. In this paper, we analysed five important strategies: redundancy, backup supplier, reserved capacity, reserved inventory, and increasing work-shifts. These supply chain resilience (SCR) strategies are evaluated using discrete event simulation and hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methods. For this end, Bayesian best-worst method (BWM) and Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) were used for weighting the SCR evaluation criteria and ranking the SCR strategies, respectively. Six discrete event simulation models were generated and run for evaluating each strategy in order to achieve quantitative criteria. On the other hand, the ideas of experts were used for weighting qualitative criteria and also ranking the alternatives. Results showed that the increasing work-shift strategy has the first rank and the reserved capacity strategy has the lowest rank.

Suggested Citation

  • Maede Mirzaaliyan & Mojtaba Hajian Heidary & Maghsoud Amiri, 2024. "Evaluating the supply chain resilience strategies using discrete event simulation and hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (case study: natural stone industry)," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 851-867, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:18:y:2024:i:5:p:851-867
    DOI: 10.1080/17477778.2024.2342927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17477778.2024.2342927
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17477778.2024.2342927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:18:y:2024:i:5:p:851-867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.