IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v18y2024i5p687-715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic literature review into simulation for building operations management theory: reaching beyond positivism?

Author

Listed:
  • Kamil Erkan Kabak
  • Johannes Hinckeldeyn
  • Rob Dekkers

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which simulation modelling has been employed beyond positivism, particularly under post-positivist and design-science-oriented paradigms, for theory building in operations management. Our study demonstrates that existing literature reviews have neglected the aspect of theory building and the generation of technological rules from a design-science perspective. A systematic literature review appraises 53 studies, published between 1976 and 2019, revealed that classical positivist approaches predominate (40 of 53 studies), followed by directive positivist (6), classical post-positivist (5), and participatory post-positivist (2) paradigms. The review highlights the potential of simulation modelling for theory building in operations management from both positivist and post-positivist perspectives. However, the dominance of positivist approaches suggests a lack of engagement with practical implementation and comparative studies. The findings advocate for greater external validation and practitioner involvement, and integrated and extended checklists for simulation studies are proposed to guide future research in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamil Erkan Kabak & Johannes Hinckeldeyn & Rob Dekkers, 2024. "A systematic literature review into simulation for building operations management theory: reaching beyond positivism?," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 687-715, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:18:y:2024:i:5:p:687-715
    DOI: 10.1080/17477778.2024.2311380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17477778.2024.2311380
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17477778.2024.2311380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:18:y:2024:i:5:p:687-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.