IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v76y2025i4p708-724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A group stability-based consensus model for multi-criteria group decision-making problems with linguistic distribution assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyi Ding
  • Wenjun Chang
  • Baoyu Liao

Abstract

In multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems with linguistic distribution assessments (LDAs), this study proposes a group stability-based consensus model to facilitate the generation of solutions that satisfy predefined group stability and group consensus requirements. The group stability and group consensus measures are constructed at the criteria, alternative, expert, and global levels. In terms of different degrees of group stability and group consensus in MCGDM problems, it can be categorized into four situations by comparing with predefined thresholds, which are: 1) group stability measure is satisfied, and group consensus measure is satisfied; 2) group stability measure is not satisfied, and group consensus measure is satisfied; 3) group stability measure is satisfied, and group consensus measure is not satisfied; 4) group stability measure is not satisfied, and group consensus measure is not satisfied. To accelerate the group stability-based group consensus reaching process, optimization problems with group stability and group consensus requirements are constructed to obtain suggested intervals and recommended intervals for LDAs. This contributes to the feedback mechanisms corresponding to the four different situations. The proposed method is applied to an ultrasonic medical imaging workstation selection problem to demonstrate its effectiveness. The superiority of the proposed method is validated through comparative experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyi Ding & Wenjun Chang & Baoyu Liao, 2025. "A group stability-based consensus model for multi-criteria group decision-making problems with linguistic distribution assessments," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(4), pages 708-724, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:76:y:2025:i:4:p:708-724
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2024.2386379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2024.2386379
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2024.2386379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:76:y:2025:i:4:p:708-724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.