IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v76y2025i3p498-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid decision support framework for planning a risk-based audit engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Li
  • Xiong Wang

Abstract

Internal audit engagement planning is a fundamental component of internal audit activities, and a poor plan can impair the audit quality. However, studies on internal audit engagement planning have limited exposure in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive and robust model has not been established to address the decision-making problems associated with the audit engagement planning process. To fill these gaps, an integrated multi-stage framework is presented for developing a risk-based audit engagement plan. The designed framework includes three stages to carry out the decision procedure. First, a combined method of best worst method and weighted probability-impact score is used to evaluate the risk exposure. Second, risk assessment results are integrated into the weighted multi-choice goal programming (WMCGP) model for selecting the audit scope and allocating budgeted audit hours. Third, WMCGP model assigns audit staff to the selected audit scope to satisfy auditor preference and fitness. Two real-life case studies illustrate that the proposed framework is a useful tool for selecting the critical audit scope and deploying appropriate resources. The research results outperform the manual procedures, enabling the audit team to use constrained resources more effectively and efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Li & Xiong Wang, 2025. "A hybrid decision support framework for planning a risk-based audit engagement," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 498-513, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:76:y:2025:i:3:p:498-513
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2024.2368615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2024.2368615
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2024.2368615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:76:y:2025:i:3:p:498-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.