IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v76y2025i2p280-293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

DEA-based internal validity index for clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Zhao
  • Qingxian An

Abstract

Internal validity indices are crucial in evaluating the quality of clustering results, serving as valuable tools for comparing various clustering algorithms and determining the optimal number of clusters for datasets. Most existing internal validity indices use the worst-case scenario to represent the overall validity. Moreover, some indices assign equal weights to distances among different clusters, even when these distances might have varying degrees of influence on the overall validity. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is an effective technique for evaluating the performance of decision-making units through the computation of the ratio of the weighted sum of outputs to the weighted sum of inputs. The weight assigned to each indicator signifies its degree of influence on efficiency. Furthermore, DEA can be viewed as a multiple-criteria evaluation methodology, wherein inputs and outputs are two sets of performance criteria. We propose a DEA-based internal validity index (DEAI) to evaluate the validity of the clustering results. In this approach, intra-cluster compactness and inter-cluster separation are employed for determining the input(s) and output(s). The DEAI is then applied to the artificial datasets and empirical examples. Experimental results illustrate that DEAI outperforms six classic internal validity indices in accurately identifying the optimal cluster across all 10 datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Zhao & Qingxian An, 2025. "DEA-based internal validity index for clustering," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(2), pages 280-293, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:76:y:2025:i:2:p:280-293
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2024.2348621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2024.2348621
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2024.2348621?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:76:y:2025:i:2:p:280-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.