IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v75y2024i8p1535-1568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new SMAA-based methodology for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices: evaluating production errors in the automotive sector

Author

Listed:
  • Bice Cavallo
  • Gerarda Fattoruso
  • Alessio Ishizaka

Abstract

Analysing and mitigating errors in production processes is a primary objective of companies in the automotive sector. Unfortunately, due to inaccurate or partially missing information, comparing errors is often very difficult, resulting from the experts’ provision of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. In the literature, several techniques have been developed to complete such matrices. These techniques merely estimate what the decision makers or experts would have entered according to known entries. In this article, we propose a new methodology based on the stochastic multi-objective acceptability analysis; we apply it to vary the missing entries of the pairwise comparison matrix, thus providing the probability that an alternative/criterion will attain a given rank. This approach gives a complete view of the possible outcomes because it represents all possible decision maker mindsets. We present a case study carried out in a multinational automotive industry where we apply our methodology for evaluating errors in the production process.

Suggested Citation

  • Bice Cavallo & Gerarda Fattoruso & Alessio Ishizaka, 2024. "A new SMAA-based methodology for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices: evaluating production errors in the automotive sector," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(8), pages 1535-1568, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:75:y:2024:i:8:p:1535-1568
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2023.2259935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2023.2259935
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2023.2259935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:75:y:2024:i:8:p:1535-1568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.