IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v75y2024i5p888-895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving multi-attribute decision making problems with incomplete weights: A dual approach

Author

Listed:
  • Byeong Seok Ahn

Abstract

This paper proposes a method of ranking discrete alternatives when attribute weights are incompletely known. There are a variety of situations in which it is reasonable to consider incomplete attribute weights and several techniques have been developed to solve such multi-attribute decision making problems. Most frequently, a linear programming (LP) problem subject to a set of incomplete attribute weights is solved to identify dominance relations between alternatives. In this paper, we explore a dual problem to find a closed-form solution and determine the extreme points of a set of (strictly) ranked attribute weights. A simple investigation of the dual optimal solution often leads to a preferred alternative and permits to find the optimal attribute weights that can be applied to the primal, based on the primal-dual relationship. Furthermore, we extend the approach to several examples of incomplete attribute weights and to linear partial information expressed as linear inequalities that satisfy some predefined conditions. Finally, we present a case study to demonstrate how the dual approach can be used to establish dominance between alternatives, when preference orders are specified for a subset of alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Byeong Seok Ahn, 2024. "Solving multi-attribute decision making problems with incomplete weights: A dual approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(5), pages 888-895, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:75:y:2024:i:5:p:888-895
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2023.2217212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2023.2217212
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2023.2217212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:75:y:2024:i:5:p:888-895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.