IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v74y2023i3p905-911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using polls to forecast popular vote share for US presidential elections 2016 and 2020: An optimal forecast combination based on ensemble empirical model

Author

Listed:
  • Joshy Easaw
  • Yongmei Fang
  • Saeed Heravi

Abstract

This study introduces the Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) technique to forecasting popular vote shares in general elections. The technique is useful when using polling data. Our main interest in this study is shorter- and longer-term forecasting and, thus, we consider from the shortest forecast horizon of 1-day to three months ahead. The EEMD technique is used to decompose the election data for the two most recent US presidential elections; 2016 and 2020. Three models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Network (NN) and ARIMA models are then used to predict the decomposition components. Subsequently, the final hybrid model is constructed by comparing the prediction performance of the decomposition components. The predicting performance of the combination model is compared with the benchmark individual models: SVM, NN, and ARIMA. Finally, this is also compared to the single prediction market IOWA Electronic Markets. The results indicate that the prediction performance of combined EEMD model is better than that of the individual models.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshy Easaw & Yongmei Fang & Saeed Heravi, 2023. "Using polls to forecast popular vote share for US presidential elections 2016 and 2020: An optimal forecast combination based on ensemble empirical model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 905-911, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:3:p:905-911
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2101951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2022.2101951
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2022.2101951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:3:p:905-911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.