IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v74y2023i1p239-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evidential reasoning-based stochastic multi-attribute acceptability analysis method for uncertain and heterogeneous multi-attribute reverse auction

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiying Zhang
  • Huchang Liao

Abstract

Multi-attribute reverse auction has been frequently adopted by manufacturers or governments to purchase goods or services. In order to address the multi-attribute reverse auction problem with imprecise and heterogeneous information, this study introduces an evidential reasoning-based stochastic multi-attribute acceptability analysis (ER-SMAA) method. Firstly, quantitative evaluations are transformed to belief degrees on a pre-defined set of evaluation grades using the imprecise Simos-Roy Figueira (SRF) method. The SRF method is also adopted to sample different sets of attribute weights compatible with the preferences of experts. Then, the evidential reasoning approach is used to fuse evaluations. Regarding the plurality of rankings obtianed by possible transformed performances and possible sets of attribute weights, the stochastic multi-attribute acceptability analysis (SMAA) is applied to draw robust conclusions about the ranking of providers. A numerical example concerning the winner determination for clean energy device procurement is given to illustrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed ER-SMAA method.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiying Zhang & Huchang Liao, 2023. "An evidential reasoning-based stochastic multi-attribute acceptability analysis method for uncertain and heterogeneous multi-attribute reverse auction," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(1), pages 239-257, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:1:p:239-257
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2035271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2022.2035271
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2022.2035271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:1:p:239-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.