IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v73y2022i6p1227-1239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An enhanced even swaps method based on prospect theory with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information and its application to the selection of emergency logistics plans under the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Qin
  • Huchang Liao
  • Lisheng Jiang

Abstract

The even swaps method considering the trade-offs between criteria is an effective multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) method; nevertheless, when implementing it, decision makers are subjected to heavy psychological burdens. The prospect theory can model the psychological characteristics of decision makers to relieve the psychological burdens of decision makers. Thus, it is effective to incorporate the prospect theory into the even swaps method so as to lighten the psychological burdens of decision makers in the even swaps method. Given that the HFLTS is a useful tool to express complex and complete evaluation information, this study aims to propose an even swaps method based on the prospect theory with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs). To catch this goal, in the even swaps method, the value function of the prospect theory is used to measure the utility changes in the trade-offs between criteria. Then, the swapped values used to rank alternatives under the measuring stick criterion are calculated based on the operations of HFLTSs. A case study about the selection of emergency logistics plans under the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed method. The sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis illustrate the reliability and stability of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Qin & Huchang Liao & Lisheng Jiang, 2022. "An enhanced even swaps method based on prospect theory with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information and its application to the selection of emergency logistics plans under the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(6), pages 1227-1239, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:73:y:2022:i:6:p:1227-1239
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2021.1897485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2021.1897485
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2021.1897485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:73:y:2022:i:6:p:1227-1239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.