Author
Listed:
- Reza Gharoie Ahangar
- Robert Pavur
- Hani Gharavi
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the deployment of a proposed search field division method (SFDM) within evolutionary algorithms (EAs) to enhance the capability of searching for the global optima in nonlinear problems. The proposed technique is benchmarked against the following eight widely-used single-modal, multi-modal, and unimodal benchmark functions: Sphere, Rosenbrock, Rastringin, Griewank, Ackley, Fletcher, Quartic, and Schwefel functions, and the outcome is compared to their standard EAs counterparts to validate the effectiveness of the deployed approach in EAs. In the proposed method, we apply three low, medium, high field divisions (1, 2, and 5) dimensions on nine different EAs simultaneously with two different scenarios, 10 and 100 variables, to reach the optimal solution. Then for the validity of our proposed SFDM technique, we examined the exploration-exploitation search space rates and diversity behavior. The results of the implementation of SFDM on eight benchmark test functions show that the consideration of dimensions using SFDM for EAs improves the outcomes of all nine tested EAs. In our proposed method, we find better compatibility with the integration of SFDM in the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm concerning searching for the optimum solution relative to the other EAs.HighlightsA novel Search Field Division Method (SFDM) for evolutionary algorithms.Applying three field divisions (1, 2, and 5) dimensions on nine different Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) simultaneously to reach the optimal global solution.The implementation of SFDM on eight benchmark functions shows significant improvement in all nine tested EAs.In our proposed method, we find the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm has better compatibility with respect to the other EAs.
Suggested Citation
Reza Gharoie Ahangar & Robert Pavur & Hani Gharavi, 2022.
"A global optima search field division method for evolutionary algorithms,"
Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(5), pages 1085-1104, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:73:y:2022:i:5:p:1085-1104
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2021.1890531
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:73:y:2022:i:5:p:1085-1104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.