IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v73y2022i10p2338-2357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing minority opinions in risk evaluation by a delegation mechanism-based large-scale group decision-making with overlapping communities

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Xiao
  • Zi-yu Chen
  • Xiao-kang Wang
  • Wen-hui Hou
  • Jian-qiang Wang

Abstract

Energy performance contracting (EPC) mechanism is a good choice for conducting energy-saving renovation projects of public buildings. Furthermore, risk analysis is critical to smoothly implement these EPC projects. Therefore, this paper intends to set up a large-scale group decision-making (LGDM) framework based on delegation mechanism to rank risk factors of EPC projects. Firstly, some risk factors and evaluation criteria are identified. Meanwhile, the assessment is expressed as picture fuzzy numbers (PFNs) to handle conflicting opinions and refusals. Then, a novel bidirectional projection measure that considers both distance and included angle is defined, which can better describe the difference between two PFNs. Next, this paper uses a suitable algorithm to cluster experts and presents a delegation mechanism to allocate trust weights of external experts to internal experts. Then, a new method to protect minority opinions is presented. In addition, we use preference risk coefficient to integrate the uncertainty of decision information in consensus-reaching process (CRP), which reduces the risk of LGDM. We come up with an extended MULTIMOORA method to make full use of three parts of MULTIMOORA method. Moreover, the proposed framework is successfully implemented in a case study and some risk mitigation measures and management implications are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Xiao & Zi-yu Chen & Xiao-kang Wang & Wen-hui Hou & Jian-qiang Wang, 2022. "Managing minority opinions in risk evaluation by a delegation mechanism-based large-scale group decision-making with overlapping communities," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(10), pages 2338-2357, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:73:y:2022:i:10:p:2338-2357
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2021.1981783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2021.1981783
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2021.1981783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:73:y:2022:i:10:p:2338-2357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.