IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v73y2021i11p2518-2535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consensus reaching with non-cooperative behavior management for personalized individual semantics-based social network group decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Gao
  • Zhen Zhang

Abstract

Leveraging social network trust relationships among experts to reach consensus has become a popular topic in linguistic group decision making (GDM). However, in linguistic contexts, it is commonly accepted that words mean different things for different people, which indicates the necessity of modeling experts’ personalized individual semantics (PISs). Moreover, experts sometimes may show non-cooperative behaviors during the consensus reaching process (CRP) due to their own interests. As a result, this paper focuses on developing a consensus reaching algorithm with non-cooperative behavior management for PIS-based social network GDM problems. First, linguistic preference relations are transformed into fuzzy preference relations by the PIS model, and then social network analysis techniques are used to obtain experts’ weight vector. Afterwards, we propose a feedback adjustment mechanism to improve experts’ adjustment willingness in CPRs, in which the trust relationships and the PISs of experts are utilized to generate adjustment advice for experts. Furthermore, a non-cooperative behavior management mechanism which dynamically adjusts the trust degrees in social network is devised. Followed by this, a numerical example is provided to demonstrate the proposed algorithm. Finally, detailed simulation results are presented to analyze the influence of different parameters on CRPs and illustrate the validity of the proposed algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Gao & Zhen Zhang, 2021. "Consensus reaching with non-cooperative behavior management for personalized individual semantics-based social network group decision making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(11), pages 2518-2535, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:73:y:2021:i:11:p:2518-2535
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2021.1997654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2021.1997654
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2021.1997654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iraj Mohammadfam & Ali Asghar Khajevandi & Hesam Dehghani & Mohammad Babamiri & Maryam Farhadian, 2022. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Human Reliability in the Mining Process Design Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Zhen Zhang & Zhuolin Li, 2023. "Consensus-based TOPSIS-Sort-B for multi-criteria sorting in the context of group decision-making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 911-938, June.
    3. Fang Xu & Mengfan Yan & Lun Wang & Shaojian Qu, 2022. "The Robust Emergency Medical Facilities Location-Allocation Models under Uncertain Environment: A Hybrid Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Jiang, Jing & Liu, Xinwang & Wang, Weizhong & Deveci, Muhammet, 2023. "Assessing the impact of healthcare service risks on healthcare demand under evolving economic and social structures: An improved GLDS decision making method considering risk attitudes," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 459-479.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:73:y:2021:i:11:p:2518-2535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.