IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v72y2021i8p1822-1843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symmetry breaking of identical projects in the high-multiplicity RCPSP/max

Author

Listed:
  • Steven J. Edwards
  • Davaatseren Baatar
  • Kate Smith-Miles
  • Andreas T. Ernst

Abstract

This article considers the high-multiplicity resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalised precedence constraints (RCPSP/max). Projects, which can be partitioned into relatively few classes, are to be scheduled subject to resource and generalised precedence constraints. We show that there exists symmetry between projects of the same class and propose two approaches of symmetry breaking: (1) adding additional constraints to the model in the form of precedence constraints, (2) remodelling the problem to reduce the number of variables. To test the usefulness of the symmetry breaking approaches a computational study is completed considering two families of discrete-time based MIP models and a number of state-of-the-art CP-based scheduling approaches. The study shows that both symmetry breaking approaches allow all solving methods to find and prove more optimal solutions. The best CP approach is then used to find a number of new best solutions to relevant problems from the MPSPlib, a multi-project scheduling problem library, for both the total makespan and average project delay objective, whereas the best MIP approach is used to determine a number of tighter lower bounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven J. Edwards & Davaatseren Baatar & Kate Smith-Miles & Andreas T. Ernst, 2021. "Symmetry breaking of identical projects in the high-multiplicity RCPSP/max," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(8), pages 1822-1843, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:8:p:1822-1843
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1595192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2019.1595192
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2019.1595192?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:8:p:1822-1843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.