IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v72y2021i7p1552-1563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A double auction mechanism for coordinating lot-sizing in supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Albrecht

Abstract

This paper presents an auction mechanism for the coordination of dynamic, uncapacitated lot-sizing problems in two-party supply chains where parties’ local data are private information and no external mediator is involved. In the first stage of the mechanism, the buyer generates supply proposals which potentially lead to system-wide improvements, and communicates them to the supplier. Then both parties evaluate the cost impact of the different proposals for their local planning domains. In the second stage, buyer and supplier submit sealed bids on each proposal. Then the bids are opened and the proposal with the greatest surplus is implemented. The procedure for proposal generation is efficient and scalable. It identifies the system-wide optimum in special cases, finds close-to-optimal solutions for general settings in computational tests, while the number of needed proposals increases linearly with the number of time periods and items supplied. Further analytical and numerical analyses indicate that the auction in the second stage is highly efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Albrecht, 2021. "A double auction mechanism for coordinating lot-sizing in supply chains," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(7), pages 1552-1563, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:7:p:1552-1563
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2020.1745698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2020.1745698
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2020.1745698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Meng & Kong, Zhaojun, 2023. "A two-phase combinatorial double auction and negotiation mechanism for socialized joint reserve mode in emergency preparedness," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:7:p:1552-1563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.