IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v72y2021i5p989-1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new hybrid method for the fair assignment of productivity targets to indirect corporate processes

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Ihrig
  • Alessio Ishizaka
  • Claus Brech
  • Thomas Fliedner

Abstract

Increasingly complex value chains and rising competition require firms to employ advanced planning mechanisms. Planning is frequently done by corporate entities based on performance analysis techniques. Within planning processes, total resource levels that should be allocated are regularly defined ex-ante, giving rise to decision problems that go beyond basic efficiency analysis. We have developed a method allowing the allocation of an ex-ante defined resource level across various processes of an organisation. We propose a mixed-integer/linear program that incorporates a social welfare function, allowing decision makers to consider fairness aspects. The practicability of the method is demonstrated in a real-life case study. The model-based allocation strategy is compared to alternative approaches. The proposed approach is beneficial in two dimensions: Either fewer activities are required to reach the total productivity target, or a lower overall strain level among the activities in respect of their improvement efforts can be achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Ihrig & Alessio Ishizaka & Claus Brech & Thomas Fliedner, 2021. "A new hybrid method for the fair assignment of productivity targets to indirect corporate processes," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(5), pages 989-1001, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:5:p:989-1001
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1639477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2019.1639477
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2019.1639477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:5:p:989-1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.