IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v72y2021i12p2720-2734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk sharing for internal resources conflict in two-stage process with slacks-based measure

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Fang
  • Yuanyuan Zhao

Abstract

Taking the two-stage process that the outputs from the first stage are taken as the inputs for the second stage as example, internal resources conflict refers to the mismatch in amount of intermediate products between two efficient stages. Although the existing centralized models can eliminate this conflict by maximizing the efficiency of entire system. In many real-world situations, however, because of decentralized organizational structure of system and independent operational mechanism of stages, each decentralized stage wants to maximize its own efficiency. This leads to the internal resources conflict, which is called the risk of mismatch in this paper. Therefore, this paper proposes the risk sharing strategy to eliminate such conflict by sharing this risk between two decentralized stages, and the slacks-based measure mixed integer linear program (MILP) model is developed to ensure that the risk allocated to each decentralized stage is minimal. Finally, the proposed method is illustrated through two examples. The results show that the proposed method can not only identify the target intermediate products to solve the potential conflict, but also make the efficiency score of inefficient system higher than that of inefficient system measured by the centralized method of “free” link constraint.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Fang & Yuanyuan Zhao, 2021. "Risk sharing for internal resources conflict in two-stage process with slacks-based measure," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(12), pages 2720-2734, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:12:p:2720-2734
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2020.1811169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2020.1811169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2020.1811169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:72:y:2021:i:12:p:2720-2734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.