IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v71y2020i4p579-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: An aggregation method for a common set of weights

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwei Zhu
  • Mei Xu
  • Cheng-Ping Cheng

Abstract

The existing approaches that deal with undesirable outputs tend to either increase the efficiency scores of DMUs or keep the efficiency scores constant and do not allow undesirable outputs to achieve the opposite effect on the efficiency scores, which is inconsistent with the characteristics of undesirable outputs. To solve this problem, You and Yan proposed a new ratio model to allocate penalty coefficients for the undesirable outputs according to their economic costs, but there are differences of magnitude and dimension in various undesirable outputs under practical applications. Therefore, this study uses common weights instead of the penalty coefficients in the original method to obtain the aggregate weights of undesirable outputs. We propose two new models to calculate the aggregate weights of undesirable outputs and illustrate the methods using data given by You and Yan on China’s textile industry. The results reveal that our approaches can generally reduce the efficiency scores of DMUs after considering undesirable outputs and are more significant than other methods available.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwei Zhu & Mei Xu & Cheng-Ping Cheng, 2020. "Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: An aggregation method for a common set of weights," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(4), pages 579-588, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:4:p:579-588
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1568843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2019.1568843
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2019.1568843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:4:p:579-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.