Author
Listed:
- Mohanad Al-Behadili
- Djamila Ouelhadj
- Dylan Jones
Abstract
Nowadays, scheduling problems under different disruptions are a key to become competitive in the global market of this century. Permutation flow shop scheduling problems are very important as they consider one of the important types of scheduling problems. In this paper, we consider a challenging scheduling problem of a permutation flow shop in the presence of different types of real-time events such as new job arrival and machine breakdown. A multi-objective optimisation model that takes into account multiple performance measures in order to minimise the effect of different real-time events is used in this paper. To solve this problem, we apply the proposed multi-objective model and adapt a predictive-reactive based Biased Randomised Iterated Greedy approach for the problem, which is hybridised a Biased Randomisation process and the Iterated Greedy algorithm. Furthermore, the proposed approach is compared against the predictive-reactive based Particle Swarm Optimisation method for the same problem. Additionally, to show the efficiency of the proposed model, we compare this model by testing the predictive-reactive based BRIG approach to two other models: the bi-objective model that consider only two objectives and the classical single-objective model of minimising the makespan. Further statistical analysis is performed in this study by using an Analysis of Variance measure. The extensive experiments and statistical analysis demonstrate that the proposed multi-objective model is better than the other models in reducing the relative percentage deviation. Additionally, despite their simplicity, the BRIG algorithm is shown to be state-of-the-art method that outperforms the Particle Swarm Optimisation algorithm.
Suggested Citation
Mohanad Al-Behadili & Djamila Ouelhadj & Dylan Jones, 2020.
"Multi-objective biased randomised iterated greedy for robust permutation flow shop scheduling problem under disturbances,"
Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(11), pages 1847-1859, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:11:p:1847-1859
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1630330
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:11:p:1847-1859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.