IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v70y2019i6p915-925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Dempster-Shafer theory in combining the experts’ opinions in DEA

Author

Listed:
  • Omid Yaghubi Agreh
  • Alireza Ghaffari-Hadigheh

Abstract

In data envelopment analysis models, values of inputs, outputs and their slack weights are usually based on the domain experts’ opinions. While they play a key role in efficiency evaluation of decision-making units in practice, when there are more than one expert, the manager encounters with the problem of effective specification of final values. The problem may be worsen when the belief degree on the opinions is not complete and differs from one expert to the other, which consequently leads to different and sometimes conflicting analytic results. Belief function defined in Dempster–Shafer theory is a powerful tool to derive a possible solution in these circumstances. We adapt this theory to address such situations in data envelopment analysis. A linear optimisation model is devised as a new combination rule of experts’ opinions, which covers the drawbacks of some existing combination rules in the belief function theory. The methodology is visualised with simple examples. Moreover, the well-known Monte Carlo experimentation is used to test the performance of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Omid Yaghubi Agreh & Alireza Ghaffari-Hadigheh, 2019. "Application of Dempster-Shafer theory in combining the experts’ opinions in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(6), pages 915-925, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:70:y:2019:i:6:p:915-925
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2018.1468858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2018.1468858
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2018.1468858?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:70:y:2019:i:6:p:915-925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.