IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v69y2018i7p1021-1032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using simulation to incorporate dynamic criteria into multiple criteria decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Uwe Aickelin
  • Jenna Marie Reps
  • Peer-Olaf Siebers
  • Peng Li

Abstract

In this paper, we present a case study demonstrating how dynamic and uncertain criteria can be incorporated into a multicriteria analysis with the help of discrete event simulation. The simulation guided multicriteria analysis can include both monetary and non-monetary criteria that are static or dynamic, whereas standard multi criteria analysis only deals with static criteria and cost benefit analysis only deals with static monetary criteria. The dynamic and uncertain criteria are incorporated by using simulation to explore how the decision options perform. The results of the simulation are then fed into the multicriteria analysis. By enabling the incorporation of dynamic and uncertain criteria, the dynamic multiple criteria analysis was able to take a unique perspective of the problem. The highest ranked option returned by the dynamic multicriteria analysis differed from the other decision aid techniques. The results suggest that dynamic multiple criteria analysis may be highly suitable for decisions that require long-term evaluation, as this is often when uncertainty is introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Uwe Aickelin & Jenna Marie Reps & Peer-Olaf Siebers & Peng Li, 2018. "Using simulation to incorporate dynamic criteria into multiple criteria decision-making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(7), pages 1021-1032, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:7:p:1021-1032
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2017.1410010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2017.1410010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2017.1410010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:7:p:1021-1032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.