IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v69y2018i1p25-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-way group decisions based on prospect theory

Author

Listed:
  • Shuli Liua
  • Xinwang Liu
  • Jindong Qin

Abstract

The three-way decision method is a new developing uncertain decision theory. The method divides a set of decision alternatives into three regions, called the acceptance, rejection, and uncertainty regions constructed from a pair of thresholds. However, seldom researches about three-way decisions take psychological attitudes and preferences of the decision-makers into consideration. In this paper, we propose a novel three-way group decision method, which considers the psychological attitudes from the decision-maker. Firstly, we provide the concept of three-way group decisions. The three-way approximation is constructed by many decision-makers with respect to a single critical value. The objects are still divided into acceptance, rejection, and uncertainty regions, respectively. Then, for the proper region (uncertain region, in general), we propose a decision method, which considers the psychological preferences through fusing prospect theory into three-way group decision methods. The alternatives in the proper region are ranked in accordance with their weighted prospect values. Finally, the optimal choices are made. The decision steps are presented in detail, and the practicality of the proposed methods is illustrated through an example.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuli Liua & Xinwang Liu & Jindong Qin, 2018. "Three-way group decisions based on prospect theory," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(1), pages 25-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:1:p:25-35
    DOI: 10.1057/s41274-016-0159-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/s41274-016-0159-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41274-016-0159-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:1:p:25-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.