IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v69y2018i10p1678-1687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A moment-free nonparametric quantity-of-quality approach to optimal portfolio selection: A role for endogenous shortfall and windfall boundaries?

Author

Listed:
  • M. Ryan Haley

Abstract

This article proposes a Quantity-of-Quality (QoQ) approach to optimal portfolio selection, which builds on the intuition of the widely applied h-index and e-index from the bibliometric literature. While moment-free and nonparametric, the method embraces quantity-of-high-quality returns and upside potential while simultaneously avoiding quantity-of-low-quality returns and downside risk. A non-standard measure of central tendency is also present, which functions in a way similar to a portfolio mean or median. The method delivers attractive and intuitively appealing results, and appears to be less susceptible to overfitting issues than the stylized Sharpe Ratio portfolio. The method is demonstrated with an established data set, and out-of-sample performance is gauged using training-holdout analysis in two distinct data sets. Because the proposed method uses a fundamentally different portfolio selection objective function than standard moment-based methods, the QoQ approach extracts information about the data-generating process that is perhaps overlooked or deemphasized by traditional moment-based methods, and as such may serve as a capable complement to standard moment-based portfolio selection criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Ryan Haley, 2018. "A moment-free nonparametric quantity-of-quality approach to optimal portfolio selection: A role for endogenous shortfall and windfall boundaries?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(10), pages 1678-1687, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:10:p:1678-1687
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2018.1489356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2018.1489356
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2018.1489356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:10:p:1678-1687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.