IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjomxx/v20y2024i1p2288855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the spatial interdependence of adverse health outcomes and neighborhood socioeconomic conditions in Baltimore

Author

Listed:
  • Tyson D. King-Meadows
  • Vishakha Agarwal

Abstract

Studies on health disparities in Baltimore, Maryland, have enriched scholarship on the social determinants of health. Yet, questions remain about whether a composite measure of disease prevalence provides greater analytical leverage over multiple measures when examining spatial patterns in health outcomes. We answer these questions by employing spatial and analytical approaches to examining census tract level data on chronic disease prevalence in Baltimore. First, we employ k-means cluster analysis to illustrate variation in health outcomes and to map said variation. Second, we compute a normalized composite measure of unhealthiness, and we plot the relationship between our composite measure and proxies for socioeconomic vulnerability. Results indicate that tracts high on unhealthiness had large proportions of residents who were more likely to be extremely vulnerable, unemployed, and of minority status. The spatial distribution of adverse health outcomes in Baltimore reflects the interlocking effects of urban segregation and socioeconomic conditions on personal well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Tyson D. King-Meadows & Vishakha Agarwal, 2024. "Mapping the spatial interdependence of adverse health outcomes and neighborhood socioeconomic conditions in Baltimore," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 2288855-228, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:2288855
    DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2023.2288855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17445647.2023.2288855
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17445647.2023.2288855?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:2288855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjom20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.