IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjomxx/v13y2017i2p350-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flooding in ephemeral streams: incorporating transmission losses

Author

Listed:
  • A. Pacheco-Guerrero
  • D. C. Goodrich
  • J. González-Trinidad
  • H. E. Júnez-Ferreira
  • C. F. Bautista-Capetillo

Abstract

Streamflow in semi-arid lands commonly occurs in the form of flash floods in dry-bed ephemeral streams. The goal of this research was to couple hydrological and 2D hydraulic model treatments of channel transmission losses, in order to show the impact of not taking transmission losses on flood hazard mapping into consideration. For hydraulic modeling the reach that is located between flumes 2 and 1 in the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed was tested. Two hydraulics models were set up, the first does not incorporate channel transmission and the second was developed to take into account several hydrographs with transmission losses as boundary conditions. The error in volume and peak runoff rate between the observed and simulated data ranges was in the order of –4.5–34.4% for runoff volume and –16.4–9.6% for peak runoff rate. The computation output interval time in the hydraulic model was 60 s and the duration of flood inundation was 6.67 h. There are important differences in depth between the two flood maps, with 0.68 maximum and 0 m minimum. The importance of using models with the dynamic treatment of transmission losses is the ability to provide an improved estimate for flood hazard mapping.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Pacheco-Guerrero & D. C. Goodrich & J. González-Trinidad & H. E. Júnez-Ferreira & C. F. Bautista-Capetillo, 2017. "Flooding in ephemeral streams: incorporating transmission losses," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 350-357, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:13:y:2017:i:2:p:350-357
    DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2017.1305303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17445647.2017.1305303
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17445647.2017.1305303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:13:y:2017:i:2:p:350-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjom20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.