IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjmaxx/v11y2024i3p554-576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rating disclosure analysis: compensation reform consequence on counteracting biased credit ratings

Author

Listed:
  • Kittiphod Charoontham
  • Kessara Kanchanapoom
  • Nartraphee Tancho
  • Jirawat Worakantak

Abstract

This study analyzes a compensation reform proposal designed to prevent inaccurate ratings produced by credit rating agencies (CRAs). Specifically, the CRA’s incentive to exert effort to observe the portfolio’s signal and adopt the rating disclosure policy is investigated under the rating-contingent and incentive-based contract. The issuer has a risky portfolio and solicits a rating from the CRA, which endogenously observes a signal and decides on a rating disclosure policy during the rating production process. The findings reveal that the CRA exerts no effort to observe a signal and inflate the rating under the rating contingent contract. Under the incentive-based contract, the CRA always exerts an optimal effort to observe a signal and adopt the full disclosure regime. Hence, the incentive-based contract better incentivizes the CRA to exert more effort to improve rating accuracy and implement the full disclosure policy than the rating contingent contract.

Suggested Citation

  • Kittiphod Charoontham & Kessara Kanchanapoom & Nartraphee Tancho & Jirawat Worakantak, 2024. "Rating disclosure analysis: compensation reform consequence on counteracting biased credit ratings," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 554-576, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:11:y:2024:i:3:p:554-576
    DOI: 10.1080/23270012.2024.2328516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23270012.2024.2328516
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23270012.2024.2328516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjmaxx:v:11:y:2024:i:3:p:554-576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjma .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.