IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v9y2000i2p60-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradigmatic analysis as a means of eliciting knowledge to assist multimedia methodological development

Author

Listed:
  • S Gallagher
  • B Webb

Abstract

We have identified two paradigms in multimedia systems design based on the software engineering and graphic design approaches. Our aim is to better inform methodological development in the field. We argue that unless and until the underlying paradigm of each community is understood, attempts to develop specific multimedia methods will be sub-optimal. ‘Paradigm’ is defined in the Kuhnian sense of a ‘disciplinary matrix’ that is composed of those shared beliefs and values that guide a ‘community’ of theorists and practitioners. This paper is based on analyses of several textbooks from both disciplines and also on interviews with software engineers and graphic designers who are actively engaged in the development of digital interactive multimedia (DIM). The results indicate that (a) Kuhn's concept of paradigm is a useful mechanism through which to examine the knowledge and approaches of these two design disciplines vis-à-vis multimedia development; and (b) that the resulting paradigms provide a useful framework from which to inform methodological development within the multimedia field. The paper concludes with a discussion of how the paradigms can assist theorists and practitioners in developing a framework for method evaluation and integration in multimedia.

Suggested Citation

  • S Gallagher & B Webb, 2000. "Paradigmatic analysis as a means of eliciting knowledge to assist multimedia methodological development," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 60-71, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:60-71
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000355
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:60-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.