IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v32y2023i6p1052-1069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing information privacy and operational utility in healthcare: proposing a privacy impact assessment (PIA) framework

Author

Listed:
  • Rachida F Parks
  • Rolf T Wigand
  • Paul Benjamin Lowry

Abstract

One needs to look only at recent data breaches to be reminded of the severe and far-reaching damage caused by privacy threats. In light of these threats, global healthcare leaders are striving to understand how to protect patient information without the loss of benefits (utility) that results from privacy-preserving mechanisms. Consequently, our study examines the relatively unexplored issue of simultaneously responding to information privacy threats and maintaining utility in a healthcare privacy compliance context. Counterintuitively, we also identify a symbiotic relationship between these two focal and interdependent efforts. We adopt an interpretive qualitative research method leveraging the value-focused thinking (VFT) approach which results in two major contributions: (1) the development of a value-driven framework presented as a means-end objective network providing a list of 16 means objectives and seven key fundamental objectives enabling higher-quality privacy decision making vis-à-vis privacy and utility. Our second and central contribution (2) is a theoretical framework of privacy impact assessment (PIA) emphasising the interplay and balance between making appropriate decisions in responding to information privacy while not hindering healthcare operations. This work provides the foundation for proposing four compelling propositions for future healthcare privacy research.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachida F Parks & Rolf T Wigand & Paul Benjamin Lowry, 2023. "Balancing information privacy and operational utility in healthcare: proposing a privacy impact assessment (PIA) framework," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 1052-1069, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:32:y:2023:i:6:p:1052-1069
    DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2022.2103044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2103044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2103044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:32:y:2023:i:6:p:1052-1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.