IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v29y2020i6p731-745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital contact-tracing adoption in the COVID-19 pandemic: IT governance for collective action at the societal level

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Riemer
  • Raffaele Ciriello
  • Sandra Peter
  • Daniel Schlagwein

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a need for rapid, population-wide digital contact tracing. One solution, Bluetooth-enabled digital proximity tracing using smartphones, promises to preserve individual privacy while helping to contain society-wide viral outbreaks. However, this digital solution works effectively only if adopted by the majority of the population. This poses a collective action problem: everyone would benefit from wide-spread proximity tracing, but the benefits for the individual are indirect and limited. To facilitate such collective action at the societal level, this paper conceptualises the option space of IT governance actions for proximity tracing adoption along two dimensions: decision-making entities (who will govern the roll-out) and accountability enforcement (how strictly will adoption and use be enforced). Examining coherent governance approaches that arise from the framework, we show that there are no globally ideal approaches but only locally contextualised ones that depend on immediate health risk, prior experience with pandemics, societal values and national culture, role of government, trust in government and trust in technology in each society. The paper contributes specific propositions for governing digital contact tracing in the COVID-19 pandemic and general theoretical implications for IT governance for collective action at the societal level.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Riemer & Raffaele Ciriello & Sandra Peter & Daniel Schlagwein, 2020. "Digital contact-tracing adoption in the COVID-19 pandemic: IT governance for collective action at the societal level," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 731-745, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:29:y:2020:i:6:p:731-745
    DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1819898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1819898
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1819898?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Struijk, Mylène, 2023. "IT Governance in the digital era : Insights from meta-organizations," Other publications TiSEM a6f02085-ff68-427f-b65a-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Björn Binzer & Jennifer Kendziorra & Anne-Katrin Witte & Till J. Winkler, 2024. "Trust in Public and Private Providers of Health Apps and Usage Intentions," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(3), pages 273-297, June.
    3. Dzandu, Michael D., 2023. "Antecedent, behaviour, and consequence (a-b-c) of deploying the contact tracing app in response to COVID-19: Evidence from Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Galetsi, Panagiota & Katsaliaki, Korina & Kumar, Sameer, 2023. "Exploring benefits and ethical challenges in the rise of mHealth (mobile healthcare) technology for the common good: An analysis of mobile applications for health specialists," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Felix B. Buesching & Dennis M. Steininger & Daniel J. Veit, 2023. "Governing digital crisis responses: platform standards and the dilemma of COVID-19 contact tracing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 267-323, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:29:y:2020:i:6:p:731-745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.