IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v22y2013i6p637-649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does risk matter? Disengagement from risk management practices in information systems projects

Author

Listed:
  • Elmar Kutsch
  • David Denyer
  • Mark Hall
  • Elizabeth (Liz) Lee-Kelley

Abstract

Risk management and ‘routine-based reliability’ is considered fundamental to project performance. Existing theories of project risk management do not fully explain why project managers stop practicing risk management information systems (IS); however, constructs drawn from organisation theory offer insights into how and why such disengagement occurs. The study examines risk management practices in 21 IS projects within 10 organisations. By focusing on risks that resulted in significant events and mapping backwards over time the practices associated with those risks, we identify that in all but five projects the manager had disengaged from prescribed risk management before executing risk responses. In most projects, the majority of formally identified and assessed risks remained unallocated and untreated. A laddering technique was used to help explain why this transpired. We found five key underlying beliefs that governed project managers’ risk management attitudes and actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Elmar Kutsch & David Denyer & Mark Hall & Elizabeth (Liz) Lee-Kelley, 2013. "Does risk matter? Disengagement from risk management practices in information systems projects," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 637-649, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:22:y:2013:i:6:p:637-649
    DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2012.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/ejis.2012.6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/ejis.2012.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:22:y:2013:i:6:p:637-649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.