IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v17y2008i2p169-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert evaluation vs bibliometric evaluation: experiences from Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Juhani Iivari

Abstract

Research assessment can be based either on expert evaluation or bibliometric evaluation. This opinion paper evaluates pros and cons of these two approaches, concluding that they are complementary approaches. Therefore, they should be properly combined and synchronized to form an informative and cost-effective research assessment framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Juhani Iivari, 2008. "Expert evaluation vs bibliometric evaluation: experiences from Finland," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 169-173, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:17:y:2008:i:2:p:169-173
    DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2008.10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/ejis.2008.10
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/ejis.2008.10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:17:y:2008:i:2:p:169-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.