IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v17y2008i2p100-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder management in IOS projects: analysis of an attempt to implement an electronic patient file

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Boonstra
  • David Boddy
  • Sheena Bell

Abstract

Implementing an inter-organizational system (IOS) requires significant organizational as well as technical changes. These will affect stakeholders (upon whom promoters depend) with varying degrees of power and with varying degrees of interest in the system. Identifying stakeholders and understanding the sources of their attitudes will enable promoters to meet their expectations more fully, and hence encourage acceptance. We examine these issues through a theoretically based study of an attempt to introduce an Electronic Patient File system in The Netherlands. All saw that the system would benefit patients, yet powerful players resisted its implementation, fearing it would affect their interests. This paper develops and tests a model of stakeholder management, showing that those with high interest in the system lacked the power to implement it, while those with low interest had the power to block it. These negative attitudes were shaped by concerns not about the system itself, but about the likely effects on working routines, power, culture and finance. This paper implies that those promoting an IOS (in any sector) should, from the outset of a project, identify their power sources and seek to reconcile stakeholder interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Boonstra & David Boddy & Sheena Bell, 2008. "Stakeholder management in IOS projects: analysis of an attempt to implement an electronic patient file," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 100-111, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:17:y:2008:i:2:p:100-111
    DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2008.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/ejis.2008.2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/ejis.2008.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:17:y:2008:i:2:p:100-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.