IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjbaxx/v8y2025i1p1-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Holistic approach for selecting chatbot development tools: combining AHP and TOPSIS methodologies

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Lachgar
  • Hamid Hrimech
  • Younes Ommane
  • My Driss Laannaoui

Abstract

The proliferation of chatbot development tools presents a significant challenge in identifying the most suitable ones for specific needs. This study addresses this issue by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to create a comprehensive methodology for selecting chatbot development tools. The study aims to provide a transparent, objective decision-making framework by evaluating tools across multiple dimensions including deployment characteristics, input processing capabilities, dialogue management, response generation, and economic considerations. Utilizing AHP for criteria weighting and TOPSIS for ranking alternatives, the methodology systematically evaluates various tools to identify the optimal choice. Key findings highlight the strengths and weaknesses of different tools, offering insights that guide developers and organizations in choosing the most suitable chatbot development tool aligned with their specific needs and strategic goals. The implications of this methodology are significant, enhancing decision-making processes within technological tool selection and contributing to the fields of artificial intelligence and automated systems development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Lachgar & Hamid Hrimech & Younes Ommane & My Driss Laannaoui, 2025. "Holistic approach for selecting chatbot development tools: combining AHP and TOPSIS methodologies," Journal of Business Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjbaxx:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:1-23
    DOI: 10.1080/2573234X.2024.2399087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/2573234X.2024.2399087
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/2573234X.2024.2399087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjbaxx:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjba .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.