IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/titdxx/v21y2015i1p67-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Access to and Utilization of Information and Communication Technologies by Agricultural Researchers and Extension Workers in Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Tinashe Mugwisi
  • J. Mostert
  • D.N. Ocholla

Abstract

Studies have shown that any information and communication technology (ICT) intervention that improves the livelihoods of poor rural families is likely to have a significant impact (direct and indirect) on enhancing agricultural production, marketing, and post-harvest activities. Notable ICT services include: online information services; communication between researchers, extension (knowledge) workers, and farmers; updates on current market information; weather forecasting; input supplies; and credit availability. The lack of up-to-date ICTs can negatively affect information access and utilization among information users. The study sought to investigate the levels of ICT access and utilization by researchers and extension workers within the Ministry of Agriculture, Mechanisation and Irrigation Development and how this affected the generation and dissemination of agricultural information among researchers and extension workers. Survey questionnaires were distributed to researchers at the various institutes in the five agro-ecological zones and to extension workers in 10 provinces. The study revealed that the role of ICTs in work and as an information channel was considered inadequate despite the indications by the majority of extension workers and researchers that they had access to ICTs. Findings on the utilization of ICTs in managing information generated by the Departments of Research and Specialist Services and Agricultural Technical and Extension Services revealed that while some ICTs were used to generate documents, most distribution of documents involved hard copies. Available ICTs included computers, printers, telephones, television, Internet, mobile phones, and fax machines, and these were considered effective in the dissemination of agricultural information, although the levels of effectiveness varied according to the resources and respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Tinashe Mugwisi & J. Mostert & D.N. Ocholla, 2015. "Access to and Utilization of Information and Communication Technologies by Agricultural Researchers and Extension Workers in Zimbabwe," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 67-84, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:67-84
    DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2013.874317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02681102.2013.874317
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02681102.2013.874317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rieple, Alison & Snijders, Sylvia, 2018. "The role of emotions in the choice to adopt, or resist, innovations by Irish dairy farmers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 23-31.
    2. Joseph Ikechukwu Uduji & Elda Nduka Okolo-Obasi & Simplice Anutechia Asongu, 2021. "Does growth enhancement support scheme (GESS) contribute to youth development in informal farm entrepreneurship? Evidence from rural communities in Nigeria," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 451-476, February.
    3. Rajveer Dhillon & Qianna Moncur, 2023. "Small-Scale Farming: A Review of Challenges and Potential Opportunities Offered by Technological Advancements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:titdxx:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:67-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/titd20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.