IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v9y2020i4p326-344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining regression trees and panel regression for exploring and testing the impact of complementary management practices on short-notice elective operation cancellation rates

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Salehnejad
  • Manhal Ali
  • Nathan Proudlove

Abstract

Variation in the performance of providers across healthcare systems is pervasive. It is recognised as both a major concern and an opportunity for learning and improvement. Variation between providers is broadly considered to be due to management practices and contextual factors such as catchment-area demographics. However, there is little understanding of the ways in which these impact on performance and how they can be measured. We use recent developments in both regression trees and panel regression techniques to explore and then statistically test complementary alignments of management practices whilst taking into account contextual factors. We apply this to 5 years of NHS hospital trust data, examining performance on short-notice cancellation rates. We find that different alignments of management practices give rise to quite different short-notice cancellation rates between trusts, with some being substantially lower. Our research offers a data-driven approach for identifying optimal clusters of management practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Salehnejad & Manhal Ali & Nathan Proudlove, 2020. "Combining regression trees and panel regression for exploring and testing the impact of complementary management practices on short-notice elective operation cancellation rates," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 326-344, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:326-344
    DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2019.1596338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20476965.2019.1596338
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20476965.2019.1596338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:326-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.