IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v5y2016i3p178-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity to model structure: a comparison of compartmental models in epidemiology

Author

Listed:
  • Sheetal Prakash Silal
  • Francesca Little
  • Karen I Barnes
  • Lisa Jane White

Abstract

Compartmental models have provided a framework for understanding disease transmission dynamics for over 100 years. The predictions from these models are often policy relevant and need to be robust to model assumptions, parameter values and model structure. A selection of compartmental models with the same parameter values but different model structures (ranging from simple structures to complex ones) were compared in the absence and presence of several policy interventions to assess sensitivity to model structure. Models were fitted to data to assess if this might reduce this sensitivity. The compartmental models produced wide-ranging estimates of outcome measures but when fitted to data, the estimates obtained were robust to model structure. This finding suggests that there may be an argument for selecting simple models over complex ones, but the complexity of the model should be determined by the purpose of the model and the use to which it will be put.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheetal Prakash Silal & Francesca Little & Karen I Barnes & Lisa Jane White, 2016. "Sensitivity to model structure: a comparison of compartmental models in epidemiology," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 178-191, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:5:y:2016:i:3:p:178-191
    DOI: 10.1057/hs.2015.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/hs.2015.2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/hs.2015.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:5:y:2016:i:3:p:178-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.