IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/thssxx/v4y2015i2p151-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a user-friendly interface for a self-service healthcare research portal: cost-effective usability testing

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan J Shaw
  • Monica M Horvath
  • Dave Leonard
  • Jeffrey M Ferranti
  • Constance M Johnson

Abstract

Usability is a critical but often overlooked factor in the design and development of healthcare information technology systems. One system increasingly being leveraged as a research and quality improvement tool is an online research portal that allows self-service access to electronic health record (EHR) data. We discuss the usability testing of such a portal through a low-cost usability inspection method: heuristic evaluation. Using heuristic evaluation methods, we identified 20 usability errors: 15.0% (3/20) were cosmetic, 35.0% (7/20) were minor, 40.0% (8/20) were major, and 10.0% (2/20) were catastrophic. Our heuristic evaluation demonstrates an affordable and efficient method to identify and correct a significant number of problems, thus improving the system using limited effort and resources. A user-friendly environment that follows accepted heuristics for good interface design is essential for ensuring accessibility and usability of data extracted from EHRs for quality improvement and research projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan J Shaw & Monica M Horvath & Dave Leonard & Jeffrey M Ferranti & Constance M Johnson, 2015. "Developing a user-friendly interface for a self-service healthcare research portal: cost-effective usability testing," Health Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 151-158, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:151-158
    DOI: 10.1057/hs.2014.26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/hs.2014.26
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/hs.2014.26?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:thssxx:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:151-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/thss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.